Compare the financial impact of Pay-Per-Lead vs Pay-Per-Appointment models on your business's growth
This funnel shows how many prospects progress through each stage - from initial contact to final sale - comparing both lead generation models.
Pay-Per-Appointment typically shows higher conversion rates due to pre-qualified prospects and scheduled meetings.
This chart shows the hours saved per month by your staff when using Pay-Per-Appointment vs managing raw leads, including contact attempts and appointment setting.
Saved time means your team can focus on high-value activities like client meetings and service delivery.
This projection shows the cumulative revenue potential over 5 years, factoring in client retention and recurring revenue from both models.
Higher quality appointments often lead to better client relationships and longer retention, increasing lifetime value.
This chart compares the cumulative revenue growth between two marketing strategies over a 12-month period. The red line represents Pay-Per-Appointment revenue, while the blue line shows Pay-Per-Lead revenue.
The steeper slope indicates faster revenue accumulation and superior long-term value, making this lead generation strategy more profitable for sustainable business growth.
Want to share these insights with your team or review them later? Enter your email below to receive a detailed breakdown of your potential ROI with our Pay-Per-Appointment model.
Your information is secure. We never share your data with third parties.
About Cost Per Acquisition
This chart compares the total cost to acquire a new client between Pay-Per-Lead and Pay-Per-Appointment models, including both marketing spend and staff time costs.
Lower acquisition costs mean more profit per client and better return on your marketing investment.